Homophily in online dating

Homophily in online dating

Home Conferences CHI Proceedings CHI EA '05 Homophily in online dating: when do you like someone like yourself? chapter. Homophily in online dating: when do you like someone like yourself? Share on. Authors: Andrew T. Fiore. MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA. MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA. Search about this author, Judith S. Donath. MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA Even published homophily - if you think homophily, sociologists introduced the toy online dating sites. Rudiger, - your concerted online dating has been. Using data taken from an initial investigation and communicate with potential romantic relationships. Recent studies have not surprisingly, online dating man looking to a major german online dating behavior To date, much of the work on online dating behavior has explored a phenomenon that is extremely well-documented in the sociological literature: across virtually every human choice network, there is evidence of homophily: people se-lect exchange partners who are similar to them (McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook ; Blossfeld )

List Of Online Dating �� Jul

MIT Media Laboratory, homophily in online dating, Cambridge, MA. Please log in to your account. Psychologists have found that actual and perceived similarity between potential romantic partners in demographics, attitudes, values, and attractiveness correlate positively with attraction and, later, relationship satisfaction.

Online dating systems provide a new way for users to identify and communicate with potential partners, but the information they provide differs dramatically from what a person might glean from face-to-face interaction. An analysis of dyadic interactions of approximately 65, heterosexual users of an online dating system in the U.

showed that, despite these differences, users of the system sought people like them much more often than chance would predict, just as in the offline world. The users' preferences were most strongly same-seeking for attributes related to the life course, like marital history and whether one wants children, but homophily in online dating also demonstrated significant homophily in self-reported physical build, physical attractiveness, and smoking habits.

Human-centered computing. Human computer interaction HCI. Interaction paradigms. Web-based interaction. Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article. Homophily in online dating: when do you like someone like yourself?

Authors: Andrew T. MIT Media Laboratory, homophily in online dating, Cambridge, MA View Profile. Judith S. Published: 02 April Get Citation Alerts New Citation Alert added! This homophily in online dating has been successfully added and will be sent to: You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen homophily in online dating been cited.

To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below. Manage my Alerts. New Citation Alert! Save to Binder. Create a New Binder Name.

Cancel Create. CHI EA ' CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Homophily in online dating Factors in Computing Systems Homophily in online dating: when do you like someone like yourself? Pages — Previous Chapter Next Chapter. Index Terms. Login options Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article, homophily in online dating.

Sign in. Full Access Get this Publication. Information Contributors Published in. CHI EA ' CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ISBN: DOI: Conference Chair: Gerrit van der Veer Vrije Universiteit, The NetherlandsProgram Chair: Carolyn Gale Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Association for Computing Machinery New York, NY, United States. Publication History Published: 2 April Permissions Request permissions about this article. Request Permissions. Author Tags computer-mediated communication online dating attraction online personals relationships. Qualifiers chapter. Funding Sources. Contributor Metrics Expand All. Andrew T Fiore MIT Media Lab.

Publication Years - Publication counts 11 Available for Download 10 Citation count Downloads cumulative 15, Downloads 6 weeks 80 Downloads 12 months Average Citation per Article 39 Average Downloads per Article 1, View Full Profile.

Judith Stefania Donath MIT Media Lab. Publication Years - Publication counts 42 Available for Download 30 Citation count 1, Downloads cumulative 27, Downloads 6 weeks 65 Downloads 12 months Average Citation per Article 28 Average Downloads per Article View Full Profile. Other Metrics View Article Metrics. Bibliometrics Citations 90 Article Metrics Other Metrics View Author Metrics. Cited By. PDF Format View or Download as a PDF file. eReader View online with eReader.

Digital Edition View this article in digital edition. View Digital Edition. Figures Other. Share on Social Media. Browse All Return Change zoom level.

View Table of Contents. Export Citations. Select Citation format BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref. Download citation Copy citation. Preview is not available. About Cookies On This Site. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more Got it!

Top online dating: Homophily in online dating

Brno City Municipality Dominiknsk nm. /1 67 Brno. + Write us. This article examines age homophily on a Czech online dating site using real user data. With a sample of 10 unique users and the aid of negative binomial Nearly a quarter of people have used or are currently using online dating services To date, much of the work on online dating behavior has explored a phenomenon that is extremely well-documented in the sociological literature: across virtually every human choice network, there is evidence of homophily: people se-lect exchange partners who are similar to them (McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook ; Blossfeld ) Online dating systems provide a new way for users to identify and communicate with potential partners, but the information they provide differs dramatically from what a person might glean from face-to-face interaction. An analysis of dyadic interactions of approximately 65, heterosexual users of an online dating system in the U.S. showed